The number one thing for New Orleans at this juncture is to truly begin to be able to derive the funds from the federal government to do what has been promised: re-establish the destroyed infrastructure in this community. Seventy percent of this city was under water. The infrastructure collapsed. The city has been without significant capital funding to be able to solve those issues. Until the city can begin to derive those dollars, it is going to be very difficult for there to be a lot of confidence in this city and for a truly significant construction effort to begin.
We're two years down the road, and the discussions are just beginning. They revolve around such questions as, "What was the state of the sewage and the water systems before the storm?" But that is dancing on the head of a pin. How do you make that determination? If that's the type of inquiry we are forced to deal with, I would suggest we are not dealing with people who are really trying to fix a problem, but rather who are trying to raise issues to avoid a problem.
You have to understand the magnitude of this catastrophe. It's as if seven Manhattans were under water for two weeks. The President said, "We're going to bring it back." But now we hear, "Well, we've given you enough money." At what point do you spend enough? At 10% of the damage? At 20%? 50? Or 100 percent? If a man says he's going to bring it back to the way it was, that, to me says more than just ten or 20 percent.
I think the nation — by virtue of what the President said and what others said and what they've done in other communities, where they have done what is necessary to bring the communities back — has an obligation. We're going to have to decide what is our national priority. We're not there yet.
King Milling is the vice chairman of the Whitney National Bank.
11 of 11 << Previous
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Save Our Wetlands Inc.(SOWL) has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Save Our Wetlands Inc.(SOWL) endorsed or sponsored by the originator. For more information go to:
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.