Looking into the future the Pelican feeding its young from a self-induced wound in its own
breast (as depicted, mysteriously, on the state flag of Louisiana) is accepted as an
appropriate symbol of both self-sacrifice and rebirth. Through his selfless efforts, man is
raised from the slavery of ignorance to the condition of freedom conferred by wisdom.
Given the current state of affairs in Louisiana, one hopes that the understanding of the Pelican
as a symbol shall point the way towards a new consciousness of ourselves as a whole, and lead us
to face our futures with strength, grace, wisdom and faith, to learn from our mistakes and carry
our successes and zest for living to future generations.
Maximizing Disaster: Behold the Results of Years of 'Downsizing'
By Murray Dobbin
September 8, 2005
Canadian philosopher Ursula Franklin uses a series of
questions to test the worthiness of public policies.
One of them is "Does it maximize gain or minimize
disaster?" Nothing in recent memory serves to
highlight this question as much as the events that
unfolded last week in New Orleans. Deregulated coastal
development, massive funding cuts to disaster
response, and political cronyism allowed for maximum
private gain at the price of an unprecedented public
disaster.
New Orleans' experience may also explain why religion
plays such an enormous role in American politics. When
you have cut every public service to the bone you had
better pray that nothing out of the ordinary happens.
The mix of emotions generated by watching the growing
human misery in New Orleans is hard to grapple with.
Heartbreak, disbelief, anger, contempt - each of them
visited and revisited as we alternately view the
desperation of ordinary Americans, the breathtaking
arrogance of their president and the sheer idiocy of
their governor. The inability of Louisiana governor
Kathleen Blanco to articulate even the most basic
human response was hard to credit. Her most memorable
statement regarding the plight of her citizens was her
shoot-to-kill orders for the troops sent into New
Orleans. "These troops are fresh back from Iraq. They
have M-16s and they are locked and loaded. These
troops know how to shoot and kill and they are more
than willing to do so if necessary."
Cronies in charge
Years of 'downsizing' of democratic governance in the
US - both ideological and fiscal - means that for
millions of Americans the only public service they can
truly count on is to be shot dead by the National
Guard. For twenty years, neo-cons and the religious
right have attacked the notion of 'entitlement', the
alleged abuse by citizens of the public purse. This is
the now unacceptable notion that citizens actually
have the right (independent of the charitable whims of
pop stars) to an education, health care, and clean
water. And, as it turns out, help from a devastating
hurricane.
In 2001, George Bush appointed Joe Allbaugh, one of
his Texas cronies, as the new head of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency, FEMA. He had no
experience in disaster management. Almost immediately,
Allbaugh declared FEMA would be downsized: "Many are
concerned that federal disaster assistance may have
evolved into an oversized entitlement program. . . ."
The next head of FEMA was Allbaugh's former college
roommate, Michael Brown, who also had no experience in
disaster relief. That background goes a long way to
explain the clueless statements Brown made in the
midst of the Katrina's aftermath: that he did not know
thousands of evacuees were waiting at the convention
centre, that he thought, despite what was being
reported on an hourly basis, the security situation
was "pretty darn good" and the evacuations of the
hospitals had gone "very well".
The history of FEMA is also the history of America's
systematic attack on its own government and it
provides a lesson for Canadians: ideology - government
bad, free market good - makes you stupid and when
combined with power it makes you dangerous. In 2003,
FEMA was downgraded from a cabinet level position and
absorbed by the Department of Homeland Security, its
mission refocused on fighting acts of terrorism.
FEMA's preparation and planning functions were all but
eliminated. The next year, FEMA denied Louisiana's
pre-disaster mitigation funding requests, at the same
time as the Army Corps of Engineers budget for levee
reinforcement in New Orleans was slashed. In 2005,
funding for the New Orleans district of the Corps was
cut by a record $71.2 million. Especially hard-hit was
the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project.
Every individual for himself
The horror of New Orleans is rooted in the extremes of
American individualism. With lots of advanced notice
of the terrifying category five hurricane about to hit
the city, what did elected officials do? They
announced that everyone should evacuate. Full stop.
There would be no help. People would have to devise
their own private way out of the disaster area. Yet,
35 percent of African American families in New Orleans
had no cars.
Not for America a collectively organized, 'forced'
evacuation as in Cuba where last year 1.3 million
people were evacuated in advance of a similar category
five hurricane. Not a single person died. And when
Cuba evacuates people it also evacuates their most
valuable possessions so they aren't destroyed.
There was one glimmer of hope for American democracy
in this horrific tale. Journalists began telling the
real story, after a predictably uncritical first take.
Looking at what was facing them on the streets of New
Orleans, how could they not? These were not the
embedded, insulated journalists of Iraq and the White
House could not control their coverage. Slowly, story
by story, American reporters and news anchors began
doing their job. For the sake of Americans, and their
democracy, let's hope it becomes a habit.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Save Our Wetlands Inc.(SOWL) has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Save Our Wetlands Inc.(SOWL) endorsed or sponsored by the originator. For more information go to:
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.