|
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Case is eligible for prompt consideration
WDSU-TV anchor and eastern New Orleans resident Norman
Robinson, a Lower 9th Ward couple and two St. Bernard Parish
residents joined forces Tuesday in a federal court lawsuit
that blames the Army Corps of Engineers for flooding that
destroyed their homes after Hurricane Katrina.
In pleadings that one of their attorneys called the opening
volley in the second Battle of New Orleans, the plaintiffs
charge that the corps' negligence over nearly 50 years in
designing, building, operating and maintaining the
Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet eroded wetlands that had
slowed storms down and turned the ship channel into a
superhighway that funneled Katrina's powerful tidal surges
toward them, breaking levees along the way.
"The United States government destroyed New Orleans and St.
Bernard Parish," said Los Angeles attorney Pierce O'Donnell,
who is leading a team of lawyers from 10 firms, most of them
in Louisiana, in trying to get the courts to hold the corps
accountable for what he branded "arrogant spurning of the
standards of constructing waterways."
O'Donnell said the corps ignored warnings as far back as the
MRGO's inception in 1958 that it could cause vast ecological
damage. The corps' failure to address those concerns led to
flooding in St. Bernard and New Orleans in 1965 during
Hurricane Betsy and even worse flooding after Katrina last
year, he said.
'A vanguard of justice'
The individuals who agreed to take on the government in the
case, O'Donnell said, are "a vanguard of justice for their
neighbors," because a victory in their case could set the
stage for thousands of other Katrina flooding victims to
seek compensation from the corps.
"The ultimate recovery, potentially running into the tens of
billions of dollars, could be the largest ever against the
United States government," he said.
In addition, O'Donnell said, he and his fellow attorneys
would use a judgment against the corps to try to persuade
Congress and the White House to establish a Katrina Victims'
Compensation Fund, like the one set up to assist the
families of people killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks in New York City and Washington, D.C.
Like two similar federal cases filed this month, the suit
brought by Robinson and his fellow plaintiffs asserts that a
1928 federal law immunizing the corps from lawsuits over its
flood control projects does not bar claims for damage
resulting from corps navigation projects, such as MRGO.
But unlike the other cases, the one filed Tuesday is not a
proposed class action, which O'Donnell said means it could
proceed quickly to trial before a judge who will be asked to
declare the corps liable for the plaintiffs' flood damages
and set "just compensation" for loss of their homes,
personal property, income and peace of mind.
Stories of loss
Robinson is suing over flooding that so severely damaged the
first floor of the house where he and his wife were helping
raise their granddaughter that she had to be relocated to
Houston.
He did not attend a news conference outside the 400 Poydras
St. federal courthouse to announce filing of the case.
But the other plaintiffs were present. They are former
Tulane University football player Kent Lattimore, who lost
his St. Bernard trailer home and his growing real estate
appraisal business to the floodwaters; nurse Tanya Smith,
whose custom-built Chalmette residence, shared with two
young sons, was ravaged by Katrina; and Lucille and Anthony
Franz Jr., an elderly couple who lost their paid-for home
and source of retirement income -- a five-apartment complex
in the 5900 block of St. Claude Avenue -- to the
floodwaters.
Attorney Jonathan Andry, who grew up in St. Bernard, said
the new case is the upshot of conversations he began having
with fellow lawyers after the storm about what could be done
to help the thousands of St. Bernard and New Orleans
residents whose lives were turned upside-down by Katrina.
He said the storm destroyed the entire St. Bernard
community, all but four of 26,000 houses, and has left
thousands from that community living temporarily in
apartments with rental assistance from the Federal Emergency
Management Agency. Many of those people told him they worry
about what they'll do once FEMA stops paying their rent,
Andry said.
"Just at a basic, human level -- the fact that this was
predictable and avoidable -- it's wrong, it's unfair, it's
unjust," Andry said. "And even more of an issue is the fact
that until something is done with the MRGO, those people
can't go back."
Class actions
In a class action clocked into court Monday, Phillip Reed, a
Katrina evacuee, seeks damages for himself and everyone else
affected by flooding that he claims was aggravated by years
of dredging the waterway by the government and several
companies. That work damaged manmade and natural
flood-protection systems surrounding Orleans and St. Bernard
parishes, the suit says. It asks the court to halt further
such activity and to award compensation to Reed and other
members of the class.
A second class action, filed April 13 as an update to a
complaint filed against the government weeks earlier,
contends the corps was negligent in design, construction,
inspection and operation of not only the MRGO, but the
entire navigable waterway system here, including the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway, the Industrial Canal, the London
Avenue Canal and the 17th Street Canal and their levees. It
asks for $2.5 million for each of its damage claims.
Both cases seek trial by a jury.
. . . . . . .
Susan Finch can be reached at sfinch@timespicayune.com or
(504) 826-3340.
FAIR USE NOTICE:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
